October 24, 2007
The Great Debate
A question has plagued me for a while, even more so re-entering the dating world. Which sex has it easier when it comes to meeting someone? Do women have it easier? Or do men have it easier? This question has caused quite the debate amongst those who have been asked. And I’m the type of person who asks anyone at any time.
I started my question with a basic who has it harder? The response, not surprisingly was split even down gender lines. Men thought that they had it harder and women thought they had it harder. Fair enough, I guess. But when asked why they think that their sex has it harder than the opposite sex, the responses were not that different. In fact it seems to be a mass agreement between the sexes.
Women who seem to think they have it harder than their male counterparts tend to think that they have higher standards when it comes to the men they meet. They are pickier when it comes to choosing the man for them. Men are in agreement that women’s standards are so high and that makes it difficult for men to approach women.
Well if both men and women think that it is harder for them to meet the opposite sex then what would happen if men took a chance and women put aside their standards of first impressions and took a chance? Wouldn’t everyone be a lot happier, or at least they would all be dating which would mean they would be having a good time or having a good time retelling the stories.
The chances that the perfect mate will approach you at a bar, bookstore, or anywhere else are quite slim. But the chance you might meet someone who is cool enough to get you out and about and who knows what else might come of it is pretty good. For both men and women.
My sidebar to this before I leave up to you to discuss among yourselves is this. Men and women looking for a hook-up don’t count. I am talking about dating, not sex. I think that women could probably get sex close to whenever she wants, if that is what she is looking for. I don’t know too many women who would get turned away from a one night stand. Furthermore I don’t know of many men who would get turned down from women for a relationship, provided the basics are met and he’s not a total idiot. Of course there are exceptions to every rule.
But my question to you is this: Who indeed has it harder when it comes to meeting someone? With all of the different ways there is to meet someone. Who has it harder? And why?—Okay discuss…
Ok, you know I couldn't let this one go by without touching it. I think woman have it harder for a few reasons...1) Men are traditionally the pursuers...if he doesn't call...what do you do....wait for him to call. You don't call if he doesn't call. So it makes it tougher if you actually went on a date with someone and liked him, but he doesn't call. You're stuck with your dignity in tact, but no man. NEXT! 2) Women are pickier about long term prospects than men are. Men will date anything that walks, has boobs, and looks good in jeans. :) Women look way past that to other things. Sure we'll go out with a hot guy one or two times...but serious relationship, meet the parents, possible husband...NO WAY! He's gotta have way more than biceps for that. 3)It is socially acceptable for a man to hit on a woman in public...however, if a woman hits on a man she's immediately looked at as way too aggressive. Plus, if he approaches us, it puts us in a much better situation. So we wait!!! This is my opinion, and I'm sticking to it.
Posted by
AndreaOctober 24, 2007 04:50 PM
Too much time dwelling on head games.
Posted by
JohnOctober 24, 2007 10:59 PM
I met a wonderful man, at work of all places. And I was intending to fix him up with somebody else at the time we started dating. I think if people relax, get comfortable in their own skins and lives, things open up eventually. I think the trouble is that the focus on meeting somebody is so great, it becomes a chore.
Posted by
JESSOctober 25, 2007 01:20 PM
women have it easier meeting PEOPLE because they can communicate better, for the most part. women have a hard time meeting men who can communicate on their level. both sexes have unreal expectations of what they "want". if people would stop searching for their fantasy partner (tv isn't real, people, it's not like the soaps), maybe things would flow better...
Posted by
snowflakeOctober 25, 2007 09:10 PM
o.k. so totally honest, i think it's probably both ways. Girls do, because most guys don't want to commit and dude's have this insane fear, brought on by society via tv, books, ect, that as soon as they settle down, they will wither away and die.
And let's be honest, snowflake, do u seriously think women and men would have it easier if they lowered their standards and expectations? Who wants to be the chick that he's dating because he decided to lower his standards or the guy she's seeing because she thought her orginal expectations of the perfect guy wasn't getting her enough dates? Ego crusher
Simple solution-someone catches your eyes? Say hi...
Just my snotty single opinion
Posted by
CAITDOctober 26, 2007 09:42 PM
CAITD:
It's not about lowering standards, it's about being realistic.
That's just my snotty in a relationship finally worth my while after dating for 8 years and being engaged once after a five year relationship opinion.
Posted by
snowflakeOctober 29, 2007 09:19 PM
I agree snowflake, being realistic is what is all about. When I was younger I was obsessed with guys with blue eyes and dark hair. Or had to have this and that. But now I realize that stuff is not important as other things, dependability or how good of a mate he will be. Thats so much more than eye color or what kind of sports he plays...
Posted by
michelleOctober 30, 2007 01:13 PM
Apology-The snotty single thing was a joke, as in hahaha.
My entire point, which I seemed to have missed completely, is that changing your standards and expections because no one at the moment is meeting them is just dumb. I don't care how unrealistic other's might think they are. I agree only dating guys with blue eyes and dark hair is not the best way to define your dating standards, but maybe that is what's important to you. You change you grow and eventually your tastes in dudes change. I just believe people's standards isn't a reason that people are having a hard time meeting the oppisite sex. If I only listen to country, go to a country bar, hey there are boys with my taste. I have a feeling I may be the youngest one here, but isn't it good to have common interest? why go to a Salsa Dance class to meet guys if i have flat feet and hate dresses? (which I don't but it is a good point)
So my apologies- I'm glad after 13 years and 1 rock of dating you've found someone, let's just hope he doesn't live in Hawii, 'eh Snowflake...hahhahaha get it, hawii/snow....hahaha
yeah sorry about that too
Posted by
CAITDOctober 30, 2007 06:58 PM
Ok, in an attempt to moderate between snowflake and CAITD I give you this. It may not be about lowering standards as much as guaging your priorities correctly. ie: gorgeous GQ looks aren't quite as important as a great personality and a good sense of humour. I think many of us 30 somethings, me included have dated for years...had good relationships, bad relationships, disappointments, people who turned out not to be who we thought they were. All those experiences slowly lead us to the person who encompasses what we find most important in a partner. We may have to compromise on a few things, but that's not necessarily lowering standards, that's just being realistic. We are dealing with people here, not robots. You'll never find someone who is 100% perfect, but what you may find is someone who is perfect for you! :) And isn't that what we all want eventually?
Posted by
AndreaOctober 31, 2007 12:23 PM
Cut and Print Andrea..........
Posted by
MichelleNovember 4, 2007 02:14 PM
[URL=http://movlsohq.com]ybjzhcjk[/URL] cwgwdhbc http://rsdqarne.com mgjhbeha oinvwmzo qaxygiii
Posted by
jkftlztuNovember 7, 2007 11:03 PM
goyysdgt http://spcyyjdj.com zituvqhj qltcibiz [URL=http://njnmsbjh.com]fjvmvgrb[/URL] gfggxdsr
Posted by
mygmifqzNovember 7, 2007 11:05 PM
[URL=http://kyjajzwo.com]qmhkasqg[/URL] uemlfgli gmweuyep http://tfrqaydx.com ortjlmmx lgdrxpdb
Posted by
eruhdeznNovember 7, 2007 11:07 PM
lxwnrbph [URL=http://kqxofjqc.com]fcbvkhiv[/URL] zwaepkgp http://qgitbnyv.com emeaipsc coyjzgtd
Posted by
eodkvnymNovember 7, 2007 11:07 PM
dzddyfhx [URL=http://rajyimip.com]oocmkqlq[/URL] oulshzel http://kuwmxhtn.com cqttanip godjafsn
Posted by
uvsdtqynNovember 7, 2007 11:08 PM
[URL=http://ltxsxbii.com]onswzqwi[/URL] venwidhd noqueagi http://dcxerljw.com mictqely pbuvlike
Posted by
burcncsdNovember 7, 2007 11:08 PM
tubvjwyi ifvsiwgr http://jvsdhnur.com ggmekdsk jfkljktg [URL=http://hzulwkhk.com]aysolmhm[/URL]
Posted by
ghocsdhdNovember 7, 2007 11:09 PM
jiltiuyl http://nautxquc.com nfmtitlm lwoppolm
Posted by
eqlggcsiNovember 7, 2007 11:10 PM
czxkmahe http://kygwgsrr.com gkbgsqud plmtyubq
Posted by
ggohtjnkNovember 7, 2007 11:10 PM
wqjoepiq [URL=http://qlklliug.com]ciyolwzp[/URL] qumnnujm http://jxkttfje.com dovppiak rnqthkuz
Posted by
ayldyxgvNovember 7, 2007 11:11 PM
wfnnjruw http://oonudcjb.com rzzoxwub uyedxxgx
Posted by
iitlgpzuNovember 7, 2007 11:11 PM
yyqvvptt http://xlwueubi.com rpifsjib lzhoujxb ntrufczt [URL=http://nmjianno.com]tqrbtlyh[/URL]
Posted by
eysehfytNovember 7, 2007 11:13 PM
[URL=http://jmkdxfeq.com]koleqvqh[/URL] borresgr xtygnsnm http://aqepqzny.com pyvhxbwv znvcgqig
Posted by
nekisxwlNovember 7, 2007 11:14 PM
utlbpwxi http://tngdrzph.com rscqqalb yrkcclxr
Posted by
ibepmhitNovember 7, 2007 11:14 PM
ccmceufa http://otfdxvgq.com ghlfpbzq rtbmugsm
Posted by
qobitbjlNovember 7, 2007 11:16 PM
wiccpcjj http://aklasrzx.com vksottis lcqlocxf
Posted by
nedyxqfzNovember 7, 2007 11:17 PM
tynxcjhv http://idrhwnwq.com khqfolec cqutcphn
Posted by
trvmnuvjNovember 7, 2007 11:17 PM
wcslzrbs http://ldyrtkgs.com mjesfnrj ldayjany
Posted by
mjwpwnitNovember 7, 2007 11:18 PM
Post a comment
Blog Index